About the Journal

Acute Care Medicine Surgery and Anesthesia (AMSA) was conceived as a new space for multidisciplinary discussions. We strongly believe that the winning approach of 3rd millennium medicine is the cross-functional one in which practitioners from different specialities continuously confront each other on the patient pathway by working as one team.

The journal covered all topics concerning the macro areas of emergency, surgery, anesthesia, and intensive care medicine; from the experimental-laboratory work, clinical studies, description of organizational models, to the assessment of clinical outcomes.

AMSA is an open access journal, so as to ensure the widest spread of papers; the manuscript review and publication process is rapid and interactive. The editor board ensures maximum support for authors at every step of the manuscript progress.

We are interested in high-quality papers, clinical studies, experimental research, epidemiological data, and to discuss innovative ideas. AMSA accepts short communications, case reports of special relevance, short reports, original research, clinical trials, reviews, perspectives, commentaries and editorials. The aim is to ensure a broad range of options for sharing experiences and ideas, from single cases to "big data," from robust observational data to challenging ideas. We also intend to address ethical and health management aspects.

Readers and authors are thus worldwide practitioners working in the above macro-areas including physician, nurses, technicians and clinical managers.<

Introduction
Peer review is applied to all research articles and the majority of other article types published in Acute Care Medicine Surgery and Anesthesia. This entails at least two independent, expert peer reviewers.

Policy

All submissions to AMSA are first checked for completeness (criteria for desk reject are available in the Guide for Authors) before being sent to an Editor, who decides whether they are suitable for peer review. If an Editor is on the author list or has a competing interest in a particular manuscript, another member of the Editorial Board will be assigned to oversee peer review. When making a decision, Editors will consider the peer-reviewed reports, but they will not be bound by the opinions or recommendations contained in them. A single peer reviewer's or the Editor's concern may result in the manuscript being rejected. Peer review reports are sent to authors along with the editorial decision on their manuscript.

At Acute Care Medicine Surgery and Anesthesia papers undergo a single-blind review process - meaning that the reviewers’ identity is not shared with the authors.

Selection

Peer reviewer selection is critical to the publication process. A variety of factors influence it, including expertise, reputation, specific recommendations, conflicts of interest, and previous performance. All of these qualities are highly desirable: speed, thoroughness, sound reasoning, and collegiality.
Before accepting an invitation to review a manuscript, potential peer reviewers should notify the Editor of any potential conflicts of interest. Editors' and peer reviewers' communications contain confidential information that should not be shared with third parties.
PAGEPress journals are committed to making editorial decisions and publishing them as soon as possible, and we believe that an efficient editorial process benefits both our authors and the research community as a whole. As a result, we ask reviewers to respond within the agreed-upon time frame. If reviewers anticipate a delay, we ask that they notify us so that we can keep the authors updated and, if necessary, find alternative solutions.

Diversity and equity

Acute Care Medicine Surgery and Anesthesia is committed to diversity, equity, and inclusion, and strives for demographic diversity among peer reviewers. When inviting peer reviewers, editors are strongly encouraged to consider geographical regions, gender identities, racial/ethnic groups, and other groups.

Misconduct
False or misleading information, such as identity theft and suggesting fake peer-reviewers, will result in the manuscript being rejected, further investigation in accordance with the Publisher's misconduct policy (https://www.pagepress.org/site/plagiarism_misconduct), and notification to the authors' institutions/employers. The Publisher follow thes Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidance about peer reviewer fraud/falsification.

Guidance
The primary goal of peer review is to provide the Editor with the information needed to make a fair, evidence-based decision that adheres to the journal's editorial criteria. Review reports should also assist authors in revising their paper so that it can be accepted for publication. Reports that include a recommendation to reject the paper should explain the major flaws in the research; this will help the authors prepare their manuscript for possible re-submission (if allowed by the Editor) or submission to a different journal.

A quick guide to reviewing is available here

Before submitting a report, reviewers should ask themselves the following questions:

• How would you react if you received this report?
• Do you find the tone offensive?
• Is it polite and professional?
• Do the authors or their competitors receive any unnecessary personal or antagonistic remarks?

Please keep in mind that any offensive language in your report may be removed by the Editor.

All papers are published as soon as they have been accepted by adding them to the "current" volume's Table of Contents.

Acute Care Medicine Surgery and Anesthesia is fully compliant with open access mandates and provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal utilizes the PKP Preservation Network, the Global LOCKSS Network and Portico to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration.

PAGEPress allows and encourages authors to deposit both their pre- and post-prints in Open-Access institutional archives or repositories. The primary benefit of pre- and post-print self-archiving is reaching a larger audience, which enhances the visibility and impact of your research.